Answer these questions to determine surgical candidacy based on clinical guidelines
Enter values to see assessment
When doctors talk about heart surgery candidates, the conversation isn’t just about who can benefit-it’s also about who might be harmed. Knowing the red flags helps families avoid unnecessary danger and guides clinicians toward safer alternatives.
Some health problems make heart surgery almost impossible because the risk of death outweighs any potential gain.
If any of these are present, surgeons usually recommend medical management or less invasive options.
Older age alone isn’t a deal‑breaker, but when it’s combined with frailty, the outlook changes drastically.
Patients over 80 with a frailty index > 0.35 rarely survive a major open‑heart procedure, so a thorough geriatric assessment is essential before proceeding.
When other vital organs are compromised, the body can’t handle the physiological shock of surgery.
In such scenarios, less invasive percutaneous interventions (e.g., TAVR, PCI) are often preferred.
Even a perfect anatomical case can fail if the patient’s lifestyle won’t support recovery.
When these factors are present, surgeons often defer surgery until the patient can achieve better control.
Doctors rarely rely on gut feeling alone; they use validated scores.
If any calculator predicts a >10% chance of mortality, the team usually explores alternatives first.
Contraindication | Type | Typical Impact on Decision |
---|---|---|
Severe chronic kidney disease (eGFR <15mL/min) | Absolute | High peri‑operative mortality; dialysis dependence |
Advanced pulmonary hypertension (PA pressure >55mmHg) | Absolute | Right‑heart failure risk during bypass |
Frailty index >0.35 | Absolute | Poor functional recovery, high ICU stay |
Uncontrolled diabetes (HbA1c >9%) | Relative | Infection risk; may be optimized pre‑op |
Severe COPD (FEV1 <30% predicted) | Relative | Ventilator dependence; consider minimally invasive approach |
Active substance abuse | Relative | Compliance issues; require rehab before surgery |
Some patients sit in a gray zone. In those cases, a multidisciplinary heart team reviews:
If the net benefit outweighs the calculated risk, an operation-often using hybrid or catheter‑based techniques-may proceed.
Age alone isn’t a disqualifier. Many patients in their late 70s undergo successful valve replacements, especially when they have good functional capacity and low frailty scores. The decision hinges on a comprehensive geriatric assessment and risk calculator results.
Absolute contraindications mean the risk of death or severe complications is so high that surgery is avoided entirely. Relative contraindications indicate increased risk, but the procedure may proceed if the potential benefit is substantial and the condition can be optimized beforehand.
Common tools include gait speed (walking 5 meters), grip strength via a dynamometer, weight loss over six months, and self‑reported exhaustion. Scores are combined into a frailty index; values above 0.35 usually tip the scale toward non‑surgical management.
Yes, many are modifiable. For example, improving glycemic control, quitting smoking, treating anemia, or optimizing kidney function with dialysis can shift a relative contraindication to an acceptable risk level.
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), minimally invasive mitral repair, and hybrid procedures combining small incisions with catheter‑based techniques are common options.